The NBA Finals continue on Friday night with Game 2 between the New York Knicks and San Antonio Spurs, and both teams head into the contest believing they can deliver a far better performance than they did in the series opener.
New York emerged victorious in Game 1, but the win came despite what was arguably its poorest offensive display of the postseason. The Spurs, meanwhile, struggled even more on that end of the floor, producing one of their weakest offensive outings of the entire season. While the game delivered late drama and intensity, there is a strong sense that both sides have room for significant improvement.
One of the biggest storylines entering Game 2 revolves around Victor Wembanyama. The Spurs superstar endured a difficult night in the opener, shooting just 6-of-21 from the field. More notably, he spent less time attacking near the basket than he typically does, with fewer than half of his shot attempts coming in the paint.
San Antonio will likely focus on getting the 7-foot-4 Frenchman closer to the rim. Against a physical Knicks defense that prioritizes protecting the paint, easy opportunities are hard to find, but Wembanyama’s size remains one of the Spurs’ greatest advantages. Establishing deeper post position and forcing defenders to collapse could create both scoring chances and open looks for teammates.
For New York, offensive execution will be a key area of focus. The Knicks repeatedly found themselves operating deep into the shot clock during Game 1, taking an unusually high number of attempts in the final seconds of possessions. While they managed to survive those situations, including a clutch late basket from Jalen Brunson, relying on difficult shots is rarely a sustainable formula.
Head coach Mike Brown has emphasized the importance of playing with pace and creating opportunities earlier in possessions. However, New York has also shown an unusual comfort level in late-clock situations, with Brunson and several other starters thriving when defenses tighten and time becomes scarce.
Another major battle to watch is the fight on the boards. Although the Spurs collected more offensive rebounds in the opener, the Knicks turned second-chance opportunities into far more points. Much of that advantage came from how New York attacked defensive switches.
San Antonio frequently switched on ball screens in Game 1, creating mismatches that Karl-Anthony Towns exploited. Whether through scoring opportunities, drawing fouls, or forcing help defenders to rotate, Towns repeatedly created advantages that fueled the Knicks’ offense.
With the Spurs looking to avoid a 2-0 deficit and the Knicks aiming to take full control of the series before heading home, Game 2 promises to be a crucial contest that could shape the direction of the NBA Finals.
